The Imperial Supreme Court
Loper Bright significantly expands the power of the Supreme Court at the expense of democratic institutions of government.
After Murthy v. Missouri, Diffuse Jawboning Remains Murky
The Court acknowledges governments’ increasing interests in regulating online speech but provides little guidance.
The End of the Chevron Era
The Administrative Procedure Act empowers courts—not agencies—to decide a statute’s single best meaning.
The Court’s Environmental Evolution
Richard Lazarus discusses the implications of a shift in the Supreme Court’s attitude toward environmental regulations.
The Growing Crisis of Maternity Care Deserts
Scholars, politicians, and advocates expose maternal health care disparities and propose regulatory solutions.
Week in Review
President Biden proposes reforms to the Supreme Court, New York bans realistic active shooter drills in schools, and more….
What the Starbucks Decision Means for the NLRB
An overlooked Supreme Court decision may give courts more discretion to second-guess the NLRB.
Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness
A new decision takes a narrow view of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause.
Supreme Court Needlessly Expands U.S. Statute of Limitations
In Corner Post v. Board of Governors, the Court renders agency rules more vulnerable to challenge.
Corner Post Broadens Loper Bright, But Footnote 8 Offers a Limit
The Court offers a possible constraint to claims that agencies have exceeded their statutory authority.
SEC Adjudication of Securities Fraud Held Unconstitutional
The Court rules that the Seventh Amendment applies to some SEC enforcement actions, but questions remain.
What Is Left of Agency Adjudication After Jarkesy?
A Supreme Court decision seemingly limited to securities fraud could imperil regulatory adjudication broadly.