Court-Proofing the Administrative State
Recent Supreme Court rulings create the need to insulate administrative decisions from judicial review.
Improving How We Measure Cumulative Regulatory Impact
The continuing need for research on the cumulative impact of regulation breeds opportunities.
The Rights of Same-Sex Couples in the Coming Administration
The incoming Trump Administration threatens the current constitutionality of same-sex marriage.
The Important Case that Most People Know Nothing About
United States v. Eaton serves as the constitutional basis for thousands of executive branch decisions.
The Administrative State in a Project 2025 World
President Trump’s Project 2025 vision requires progressives to provide an equally compelling alternative.
Managing Regulatory Review in the Biden Administration
At the 2024 PPR Distinguished Lecture on Regulation, Administrator Revesz highlighted the Biden Administration’s regulatory reform efforts.
The Virginia Model for Regulatory Modernization
Virginia can serve as a model for other states looking to reform and modernize their regulatory regimes.
Congressional Constituent Service Inquiries
Scholar recommends improvements to agencies’ management of congressional requests on behalf of constituents.
Promoting Consistency and Transparency in Individualized Guidance
New research highlights the unique challenges agencies face when providing individual regulatory guidance.
Participation of Senate-Confirmed Officials in Administrative Adjudication
A new report to ACUS makes recommendations for how Senate-confirmed officials should participate in adjudication.
Choosing the Court to Review Agency Rulemaking
ACUS’s recommendation on judicial review of federal regulations provides much-needed clarity.
Drilling Down on Loper Bright and Health Care Regulation
The Loper Bright decision leaves hundreds of pivotal health care regulations subject to litigation.