Opinion

The Trump Administration’s 1-in-2-out policy is more of an ineffective symbol than an action toward deregulation.

Over-reliance on the VSL measure often leads to excessive consideration and regulation of risk.

As a practical matter, the VSL is successful in balancing the benefits and costs of regulation.

Regulators must measure welfare using transparent methods before determining the policies themselves.

The VSL is necessarily based on market preferences that accurately reflect society’s valuation of risks and benefits.

The primary drawback of the VSL is that it fails to account for future generations’ valuation of benefits and costs.

Using the VSL to measure benefits promotes the interests of individuals who are affected by regulation.

Strategies used by the Trump Administration will serve as a blueprint for future Presidents.

A response to a lively debate on the modern administrative state.

Congress should not sabotage regulatory authorizations with sunset provisions.

Courts should continue to apply canons of construction narrowly to limit the broad congressional delegation of power.

The FTC should use adjudications to establish policy on employment non-compete clauses.