Opinion

Requiring EPA cost-benefit analysis could ensure that regulations do more good than harm.

Recent proposed rule can be better understood by considering the fate of the Clean Power Plan in the Supreme Court.

EPA’s advance notice raises fundamental questions about how the agency should weigh costs and benefits.

OIRA review of significant tax rules raises new questions about the shape of centralized administrative oversight.

The Supreme Court’s approval of Ohio’s voting roll purge will limit voter turnout in future elections.

The Supreme Court’s most recent term suggests that some justices would revise the doctrine of Chevron deference.

Reducing the power of technocrats will strengthen democratic legitimacy and political stability.

Regulatory counting paints a distorted picture of the costs and benefits of regulatory action.

A real EPA transparency rule should be grounded in scientific practices, not constituency interests.

Former EPA Administrator’s last action may foreshadow the agency’s future plans for regulating pollution.

Reagan-era regulatory reform will help restrict rule rescissions under Executive Order 13,771.

The Court has set two different standards for when employees can waive their workplace rights.