Opinion

Obama-era agreement on insurance regulation strikes the right level of detail after international negotiation.

Legal scholar reexamines the formal rulemaking process in response to criticism.

Law does not address claims of excessive delegation of Congress’s policymaking responsibilities.

Rather than raising alarm bells, government uses of artificial intelligence fit well within existing legal frameworks.

Regulatory reform bill’s public hearing requirement will hinder agencies’ attempts to regulate.

Recent bill would provide much-needed change to the most prominent source of U.S. administrative law.

President Trump’s “one-in, two-out” mandate is irrational and violates the Constitution.

Legal scholar argues that the oft-criticized formal rulemaking process has virtues in proper settings.

Provisions of the Senate’s Regulatory Accountability Act would do more harm than good.

Regulatory reform bill’s requirement of oral evidentiary hearings for rulemakings may prove to be ineffective.

Oral argument transcripts may reveal Supreme Court Justices’ motivations for speaking.

The Trump Administration’s new social cost of carbon policy muddies the waters.