The 2018 Regulatory Year in Review
The Regulatory Review presents its leading essays from the past year.
Revamping the American Justice System
Leading scholars and practitioners comment on a recent book that argues for a simpler, more streamlined legal system.
Bringing Expertise to the Gun Debate
Experts address the promise and potential limitations of gun control measures.
Improving Agency Procedure
Experts highlight new model adjudication rules and recent recommendations to improve governmental processes.
Dissecting the Debate Over Regulation
Commentators debate central questions about the role of regulations in society.
Social Justice in a Green Economy
Scholars debate the economic implications of climate change regulations for American communities.
Judge Kavanaugh and Administrative Law
What would Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation mean for the U.S. Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions?
Consistency and Transparency in Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.
The Supreme Court’s 2017–2018 Regulatory Term
Analysts offer insights about the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of the past term.
Science, Transparency, and Environmental Policy
Scholars and regulatory commentators debate the significance of EPA’s recently proposed “transparency” rule.
New Developments in Regulatory Benefit-Cost Analysis
Scholars and industry representatives highlight takeaways from conference on new regulatory developments.
Can President Trump Get Rid of Robert Mueller?
Scholars assess President Trump’s claim of authority to fire special counsel Mueller.