Synopsis

Certain communities may face disproportionate harms in the wake of natural disasters.

The judicial system may need to adapt to allow climate change cases to be heard in court.

Unlike new drugs and devices, combination products may fall through the regulatory cracks.

European soccer authority’s economic regulations create unintended losses for clubs.

Scholar argues that judges, rather than the legislature, should continue to regulate insider trading.

Scholar argues that Trump’s steel tariffs and the responses from other countries endanger the free trade system.

Attorneys argue that Department of Interior enforcement practices threaten migratory birds.

Scholar discusses how the Copyright Office could exercise broader rulemaking power.

Scholar argues that FDA can, and should, regulate marijuana edibles.

Scholar proposes framework for the use of empirical evidence in child welfare policies.

Scholars propose mechanisms for regulating augmented reality technology.

The lack of regulation on animals’ greenhouse gas emissions opens the door for climate change litigation.