COVID-19 and Cooperative Administrative Federalism in Germany
Germany’s response to COVID-19 consists of federal delegation, state regulation, and multi-level cooperation.
Continuous Judicial Review in Coronavirus Times
The Israeli judiciary exerts oversight and influence over the executive’s COVID-19 response.
Rescuing the European Economy from COVID-19
Political and constitutional constraints hinder the EU’s response to the economic crisis.
Regulating in Times of Tragic Choices
As Italy begins its second phase of COVID-19 regulation, trust in government regulatory action is essential.
Rethinking Judicial Oversight in a Time of Crisis
Administrative accountability demands resilient courts, especially in emergencies.
India’s Executive Response to COVID-19
Executive action, and judicial deference to it, dominate India’s pandemic response.
The U.K. Races to Catch Up on COVID-19
The United Kingdom’s lockdown measures prompt questions of its legality.
Regulatory Justification and Coordination in South Africa
The government’s response to COVID-19 highlights the importance of expertise and cooperation in regulation.
Israel Pushes Its Emergency Powers to Their Limits
Israel’s executives have authority to combat COVID-19, but they appear to be abusing their power.
Regulatory Cooperation to Combat Public Health Crises
Promoting international agreements can enhance regulatory cooperation over public health.
Disrupting Administrative Law in a Public Health Crisis
Australia disabled fundamental checks on its regulatory system to respond to COVID-19.
Exporting the Italian Model to Fight COVID-19
Italy’s early missteps in responding to the coronavirus can teach the world lessons on responding to pandemics.