PPR

The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.

Scalia recounts his role in challenging a SEC rule on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Appearing before agencies affords the public an important opportunity to have a genuine impact on the law.

Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.

PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.

This publication’s new name and newly designed website constitute a significant step forward, in furtherance of its mission of public service.

Prevention of such catastrophe requires adept networking of regulatory scholarship, like that demonstrated in an important new book.

The Regulatory Review revisits the biggest regulatory news of the past year.

The Regulatory Review celebrates the end of 2016 by recapping our series from the past year.

The Regulatory Review celebrates the end of 2016 by featuring our top news and analysis pieces from the past year.

The Regulatory Review celebrates the end of 2016 with the top opinion posts by regulatory law experts from the past year.

No rubric exists to decide how to navigate the use of automation in the administrative state, but society can make informed choices.