Primary

The Administrative Procedure Act empowers courts—not agencies—to decide a statute’s single best meaning.

Richard Lazarus discusses the implications of a shift in the Supreme Court’s attitude toward environmental regulations.

Scholars, politicians, and advocates expose maternal health care disparities and propose regulatory solutions.

An overlooked Supreme Court decision may give courts more discretion to second-guess the NLRB.

A new decision takes a narrow view of the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause.

In Corner Post v. Board of Governors, the Court renders agency rules more vulnerable to challenge.

The Court offers a possible constraint to claims that agencies have exceeded their statutory authority.

The Court rules that the Seventh Amendment applies to some SEC enforcement actions, but questions remain.

A Supreme Court decision seemingly limited to securities fraud could imperil regulatory adjudication broadly.

Scholars discuss methods to combat the threat climate change poses to vulnerable species.

A Supreme Court decision enhances Native Nations’ self-determination by requiring the federal government to reimburse certain healthcare costs.

A recent Supreme Court decision affects ATF’s efforts to redefine gun regulations.