Individual Liberty, Public Health, and the Battle for the Nation’s Soul
Contrary to longstanding precedent, individualism reigns supreme in recent legal decisions over COVID-19.
Californians Debate Controversial Ethnic Studies Curriculum
A state-level debate over model lesson plans echoes a national battle over teaching racial justice.
Regulatory Control of Potentially Addictive Drugs
Scholar explains why the DEA—not FDA—has power over the classification of potentially addictive substances.
Maintaining Local Values in the Face of Digital Platforms
Academics argue that city authorities could cooperate with tech companies to align their values.
Improving Agency Litigation Webpages
A new ACUS recommendation emphasizes how agencies can increase public access to litigation information.
Addressing Big Tech’s Power Over Speech
Antitrust has a role in addressing the considerable power social media companies possess over speech.
Improving Models for Agency Appellate Review
An ACUS study examines how agency review models differ across agencies.
Rules for the Rule-Makers
ACUS releases a recommendation for how agencies should regulate their rulemaking procedures.
Reining in Immigration Adjudicators
Two scholars argue that immigration adjudication should no longer be afforded Chevron deference.
Rethinking Discretionary Bid Protests
Bid challenges are effective management tools, not just administrative attacks.
Macaroni and Cheese with a Side of Regulation
FDA faces mounting pressure from advocacy groups claiming a high chemical content in macaroni and cheese.