Primary

Two essays by student winners of a Penn Law essay competition describe important regulatory developments.

Scholars argue that federal agencies should not use guidance documents to regulate controversial issues.

Scholars consider methods for regulating individualized prices based on personal data.

An arts-based framework could re-democratize the rulemaking process.

Scholar urges Congress to redefine common carriage to promote flight-sharing platforms in the United States.

Scholar argues regulation is needed to address unbridled intermediary activity in cryptocurrency.

Better oversight is needed of the “biohacking” that individuals perform on themselves.

New carbon rule is entirely at odds with Trump Administration’s earlier rhetoric on the Clean Power Plan.

Opinion letter finds a gig economy company’s workers are independent contractors.

American doctrines of judicial review may provide useful models for Brazilian courts.

Scholar argues that the Trump Administration has discredited cost-benefit analysis.

The anti-regulatory effort constructed in the 1970s has influenced American society, but its own success may lead to its demise.