Primary

Scholar argues that FDA has the authority to regulate coverage algorithms used by health care insurers.

DOGE’s approach to deregulation demonstrates the need for economists and lawyers to learn from each other.

Courts examine the impact of Title VII and how the prevention of workplace sexual harassment intersects.

The deregulatory goals of the 1-in-10-out directive may be stymied by agency gaming and legal challenges.

A pending case penalizes the use of insider information about one company to trade another company’s stock.

Reforming occupational licensing rules can reduce the cost of professional services and improve efficiency.

The Trump Administration’s new 1-in-10-out executive order is more flawed than its predecessor.

Jason Levitis discusses how federal policies and state-level innovations can shape access to health insurance.

Scholars discuss the history of birthright citizenship and its modern importance.

History suggests that public accountability and institutional checks can restore stability in government.

Scholars respond to a review of their work and expand on the book’s lessons for the future.

Shapiro and Tomain’s new book highlights political and economic constraints on the incoming Trump Administration’s ability to achieve its goals.