Rules for the Rule-Makers
ACUS releases a recommendation for how agencies should regulate their rulemaking procedures.
Reining in Immigration Adjudicators
Two scholars argue that immigration adjudication should no longer be afforded Chevron deference.
Rethinking Discretionary Bid Protests
Bid challenges are effective management tools, not just administrative attacks.
Using Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Agencies
ACUS issues a statement to help agencies make more informed decisions about artificial intelligence.
Publication of Policies Governing Agency Adjudicators
To enhance transparency, agencies should publish information about adjudicators on their websites.
Transparency and Privacy in Public Rulemaking Dockets
A new ACUS recommendation seeks to balance transparency with privacy when agencies disclose rulemaking comments.
Improving the Accessibility and Transparency of Administrative Programs
The Administrative Conference issues recommendations to enhance fairness and transparency in administrative government.
Reconstructing Expertise to Combat Financial Risk
Scholar argues that U.S. financial regulators need a revived research agency.
A New Reporting Structure for Bureau of Land Management Rangers
A Bureau of Land Management policy may weaken enforcement of federal laws and regulations on public lands.
The Trump Administration’s Weaponization of the “Major Questions” Doctrine
Deregulatory attacks have twisted a legal concept meant only to restrain extraordinary actions.
Factoring Equity into Benefit-Cost Analysis
Distributional weighting shows how benefit-cost analysis can be improved.
The Absence of Black Financial Regulators
Scholar argues that U.S. financial regulatory agencies must reflect the people they serve.