Process

The Optimizing Government Project brings together scholars and researchers to discuss the use of machine learning by government.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.

Scalia recounts his role in challenging a SEC rule on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Appearing before agencies affords the public an important opportunity to have a genuine impact on the law.

Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.

PPR panel discussion analyzes the Trump Administration’s regulatory goals and its likelihood of achieving them.

Legal scholar argues for greater reliance on entrepreneurial strategies in regulation.

Scholars argue changing global attitudes and U.S. legal culture have impacted white-collar prosecutions.

Scholar argues that society is best off when regulators punish violations after the fact.

Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.

Scholar argues that regulators should try to impose penalties before rule violations can hurt society.

Basic principles of American government limit the political role of administrative agencies in legislative debates.