Rights

Scholar argues that federal campaign laws need to be updated to reflect both legal and social changes.

Smaller local jurisdictions are adopting pro-immigration policies at an unprecedented rate.

Law student argues that recent European Union privacy regulation does not fully protect children.

As surveillance of work activity increases, scholars argue for protecting privacy of employees.

The Supreme Court’s approval of Ohio’s voting roll purge will limit voter turnout in future elections.

The Court has set two different standards for when employees can waive their workplace rights.

Despite a watershed ruling, the gaming industry must still contend with onerous and redundant state oversight.

Uncertainty remains surrounding the fate of non-citizens seeking a home in the United States.

Court holds that agency fees are compelled speech prohibited by the First Amendment.

Challenges to redistricting are unlikely to be successful after recent Supreme Court decisions.

While skirting the First Amendment, the Court set a potentially far-reaching standard for finding bias.

The Supreme Court’s ruling on sports betting has broad implications for anti-commandeering issues.