Rights

Analysts offer insights about the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of the past term.

Scholar contends that the emergence of “integrative enforcement” shows a shifting locus of immigration policy.

The President’s executive order purportedly ending family separations was merely symbolic.

Scholar explores a new legal basis for regulating street and cyber-harassment.

Federal judge discusses the Trump Administration’s original travel ban.

Contribution limits are no longer justified in the age of social media, scholar argues.

The Supreme Court should follow the Fourth Circuit in prohibiting impermissible animus while maintaining the President’s discretion.

The Supreme Court will decide if Ohio can automatically remove inactive voters from its registry.

Scholar argues that policymakers should apply the substance of executive branch lethal force regulations to the police context.

The Trump Administration’s measures to restrict immigration do not square with its push to deregulate.

Federal appeals court weighs employers’ obligation to accommodate employees’ religious practices.

President’s memo favoring a ban of transgender service members raises new questions for future litigation.