Process

Scholars examine the benefits, challenges, and best practices of evidence-based policymaking.

Scholar argues that judges, rather than the legislature, should continue to regulate insider trading.

Scholar discusses how the Copyright Office could exercise broader rulemaking power.

A new ACUS recommendation on interpretive rules largely aligns with a prior one on policy statements.

ACUS sets out new recommendations for agency hiring of ALJs.

ACUS recommends agencies take steps to make their guidance more accessible.

Scholars analyze ACUS recommendations addressing public access to guidance, ALJ hiring procedures, and interpretive rules.

This Saturday Seminar explores how different types of regulation treat gender identity and sexual orientation.

Scholar proposes framework for the use of empirical evidence in child welfare policies.

A recent dispute illustrates how policymakers often miss crucial insights about structuring government.

Proposed legislation could change state regulations that allocate presidential electoral votes.

Agency predictions of court behavior are not always a tenable justification for rescission.