Process

Scholar examines how agencies operate independently of courts through rulemaking and legislative drafting.

Scholars evaluate the viability of adjusting regulations to accommodate changes in economic conditions.

President Trump’s regulation-trimming executive order will likely survive judicial scrutiny despite potential policy objections.

President Trump’s regulatory budget executive order withholds agency action and harms the American public.

The President’s one-in, two-out executive order may be difficult to implement, but it is not unconstitutional.

Concerns about runaway regulatory costs are overblown.

Recent momentum in favor of regulatory reform is a positive development, and long overdue.

The Early Participation in Regulations Act will further complicate the rulemaking process.

The law goes against the public interest, favoring lobbyists over public protections.

Legal scholar reexamines the formal rulemaking process in response to criticism.

Law professor argues that states play a critical, but often neglected, role in constitutional decision-making.

Scholars debate the merits and drawbacks of the recently proposed Regulatory Accountability Act, which would dramatically reform the rulemaking process.