Rules for the Rule-Makers
ACUS releases a recommendation for how agencies should regulate their rulemaking procedures.
Rethinking Discretionary Bid Protests
Bid challenges are effective management tools, not just administrative attacks.
Using Artificial Intelligence in Administrative Agencies
ACUS issues a statement to help agencies make more informed decisions about artificial intelligence.
Publication of Policies Governing Agency Adjudicators
To enhance transparency, agencies should publish information about adjudicators on their websites.
Transparency and Privacy in Public Rulemaking Dockets
A new ACUS recommendation seeks to balance transparency with privacy when agencies disclose rulemaking comments.
Improving the Accessibility and Transparency of Administrative Programs
The Administrative Conference issues recommendations to enhance fairness and transparency in administrative government.
Managing Adjudicators’ Information Access in the Internet Age
ACUS issues new recommendation to help agency adjudicators conduct online independent research.
Recruiting and Hiring Agency Attorneys
ACUS recommendations seek to improve the processes for hiring government lawyers.
Improving Economic Analysis by Reorganizing Agencies’ Economists
An ACUS recommendation could help agencies better organize their economics staffs.
Identifying Agency Leaders
The federal government can and should do a better job of making basic information about high-level officials easily available.
Seeking to Improve Administrative Transparency and Expertise
Federal agency issues recommendations to improve transparency and help better inform administrative government.
Interpretive Rules in Practice
A new ACUS recommendation on interpretive rules largely aligns with a prior one on policy statements.