Administrative Law

Two essays by student winners of a Penn Law essay competition describe important regulatory developments.

An arts-based framework could re-democratize the rulemaking process.

American doctrines of judicial review may provide useful models for Brazilian courts.

Scholar argues that the Trump Administration has discredited cost-benefit analysis.

The late justice’s opinion in Chevron v. NRDC has greatly shaped judicial reasoning about administrative law.

In Merck v. Albrecht, the issue of federal preemption has crossed over the typical conservative and liberal divide.

The Supreme Court’s recent Weyerhaeuser decision will add to the administrative costs of protecting endangered species.

A recent Supreme Court decision could reshape judicial deference of agency actions.

The intelligible principle standard lives to see another day—but for how long remains unclear.

Commentators highlight the ramifications of the Court’s most significant regulatory cases.

Risk-based regulation requires regulators to choose which decision-making principles to apply.

The latest Economic Report of the President highlights the importance of studying cumulative regulatory costs.