Concluding Thoughts on Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Public’s Impact in Rulemaking
The Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. EPA illustrates that the public has a serious role to play in the rulemaking process.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and Reasoned Agency Decision-Making
Scalia recounts his role in challenging a SEC rule on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
The Value of Public Participation in Rulemaking
Appearing before agencies affords the public an important opportunity to have a genuine impact on the law.
The Public’s Role in Administrative Law
Public participation in the rulemaking process serves a vital role in improving the law.
The Regulatory Accountability Act and the Obsolescence of Formal Rulemaking
Administrative agencies should not be required to use a process that has been obsolete for decades.
Constraining the President’s Appointment Power
Court holds President Obama’s appointment of acting General Counsel for the NLRB was unlawful.
The Supreme Court’s 2016–2017 Regulatory Term
Legal scholars and practitioners analyze the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.
An Empirical Analysis of the Establishment of Independent Agencies
A divided government may not fully explain the creation of agencies not directly controllable by the President.
Giving the Platypus of Formal Rulemaking a Second Look, Again
Legal scholar reexamines the formal rulemaking process in response to criticism.
A Look at States’ Roles in Administrative Constitutionalism
Law professor argues that states play a critical, but often neglected, role in constitutional decision-making.
The Ongoing Rise of Good Governance in China
Influenced by American and Western practices, China continues to produce governmental innovations.
Adjudicating by Algorithm, Regulating by Robot
Rather than raising alarm bells, government uses of artificial intelligence fit well within existing legal frameworks.