The Supreme Court’s 2021-2022 Regulatory Term
Scholars and practitioners discuss the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of the last term.
Did Step Zero Help Doom Chevron?
One of the Supreme Court’s most significant administrative law precedents may soon be overturned.
Threatening Chevron Deference Threatens Government as a Whole
Scholar argues that overruling deference to agencies will constrain U.S. government action.
Medicare and Chevron in the Supreme Court’s New Term
With two Medicare cases, the U.S. Supreme Court may change an important rule on deference to agency decisions.
Regulatory Reactivity in FDA’s Approval of Aduhelm
A controversial approval of an Alzheimer’s treatment reveals a core weakness in oversight of agency discretion.
Reining in Immigration Adjudicators
Two scholars argue that immigration adjudication should no longer be afforded Chevron deference.
The Trump Administration’s Weaponization of the “Major Questions” Doctrine
Deregulatory attacks have twisted a legal concept meant only to restrain extraordinary actions.
The Nondelegation Doctrine Is Alive and Well in the States
The U.S. Supreme Court could take a cue from Michigan and other states on reviving the nondelegation doctrine.
Another Explanation of Justice Gorsuch’s Bostock Vote
A recent case protecting LGBTQ rights may help the Supreme Court circumscribe the administrative state.
The Ongoing Saga of Chevron and Net Neutrality
The FCC’s position on internet access will continue to change unless Congress passes clear legislation.
Judicial Deference to Agencies’ Decisions in Brazil and the United States
American doctrines of judicial review may provide useful models for Brazilian courts.
Justice Stevens’s Legacy to the Administrative State
The late justice’s opinion in Chevron v. NRDC has greatly shaped judicial reasoning about administrative law.