Do Not Blame Us
Court disregards the Clean Air Act’s clear language in applying the major questions doctrine to curb EPA’s climate authority.
EPA Will Say Anything to Avoid Addressing Climate Change
New carbon rule is entirely at odds with Trump Administration’s earlier rhetoric on the Clean Power Plan.
Can Red and Purple States Go Green?
Scholars argue that state policymaking cannot effectively counteract federal environmental deregulation.
You Need to See It to Believe It
Scholars argue that the use of visual media in federal rulemaking promotes democratic values.
Restoring Science and Economics to EPA’s Benefit Calculation
EPA’s proposed transparency rules would make the agency’s analyses more scientifically rigorous.
Credible and Stable Regulation Encourages Voluntary Climate Action
President Obama’s Clean Power Plan prompted companies to expand transparency about their carbon emissions.
Get Moving With Climate Action
Former EPA Administrator urges the public to take action against climate change.
The Pitfalls of Consistent Cost-Benefit Analyses
A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.
Putting Trump’s “Affordable Clean Energy” Plan in Perspective
Recent proposed rule can be better understood by considering the fate of the Clean Power Plan in the Supreme Court.
Let’s Be Real About State and Local Climate Action
Federal action is key to effectively addressing climate change.
Holding Congress Accountable
A New Deal-era proposal would produce more effective, less burdensome regulation.
How the Clean Power Plan’s Repeal Undermines Regulatory Analysis
The Trump Administration’s purported economic justification weakens the credibility of cost-benefit analysis.