EPA

A one-size-fits-all approach to cost-benefit analysis won’t necessarily ensure better policy.

Environmentalists should question any move by this Administration’s EPA to reform its cost-benefit analysis.

Requiring EPA cost-benefit analysis could ensure that regulations do more good than harm.

EPA’s advance notice raises fundamental questions about how the agency should weigh costs and benefits.

Experts debate EPA’s recent move to consider regulating its own cost-benefit analyses.

Scholar argues that despite progressive roots, U.S. transparency laws have taken an anti-government focus.

A real EPA transparency rule should be grounded in scientific practices, not constituency interests.

Former EPA Administrator’s last action may foreshadow the agency’s future plans for regulating pollution.

Reagan-era regulatory reform will help restrict rule rescissions under Executive Order 13,771.

The Clean Air Act’s success reveals the flaws in the standard critique of the administrative state.

Ruling may lead to protracted and conflicting litigation over EPA’s Clean Water Rule.

Recent judicial decisions help clarify the legality of rule freezes after a change in administration.