Government Agencies

Trial-and-error decision-making could provide great benefits to regulators.

Regulators should rely on both clinical and actuarial judgment when setting policy.

Random audit programs should prioritize transparency to enhance legitimacy and minimize reputational risks.

A centralized platform for rigorous policy pilots would encourage collaboration between agencies and academia.

Scholars examine the benefits, challenges, and best practices of evidence-based policymaking.

Naming and shaming can serve as a legitimate, efficient, and democratic regulatory approach.

Distinguished lecture at Penn Law offers hope that the long shutdown of the federal government in early 2019 will lead to positive reforms.

Scholar argues that shaming is an effective tool against violators of regulations.

Contributors to a new book outline the prerequisites for success by regulatory agencies.

Scholar discusses the role of policy learning and reputation in regulatory excellence.

Leading regulatory scholar provides strategic advice for improving regulatory enforcement.

To be excellent, a regulator must select the correct virtues.