Litigation

Scholars propose regulatory safeguards for the burgeoning third-party litigation finance industry.

An analysis of state and federal court decisions uncovers standards to guide governmental use of artificial intelligence.

Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom may test judges and standards of admissibility.

Scientific research generated by civil settlements could help drive future EPA regulation.

A new ACUS recommendation emphasizes how agencies can increase public access to litigation information.

Agency predictions of court behavior are not always a tenable justification for rescission.

Scholar suggests that the NCAA’s defense of amateurism no longer stands after a recent Supreme Court decision.

Controversial rule promotes personal care and bars forced arbitration in long-term health care.

Consumer protection agency wants to promote private enforcement of finance laws.

Deadline suits may offer key opportunity to even the playing field in regulatory agenda-setting.

Sue and settle tactics may influence agency behavior and rulemaking.

The Regulatory Review post sparks further debate over recent bill to curb negotiated agreements about rulemaking.