Reconsidering Online Platforms’ Liability
To protect users’ free speech and privacy rights, scholar calls for limiting online platforms’ legal shield.
The Good-Faith Assumption Online
Scholar argues that online platforms should foster positive user experiences through self-regulation.
The Boundaries of Internet Speech
Scholars debate current challenges in regulating offensive and harmful speech on the internet.
Modern Romance Hinges on Dating App Self-Regulation
Scholar proposes that the dating app industry adopt a self-regulatory model to promote user safety.
Is the Fair Housing Act Stifled by Section 230?
Scholar argues that a platform liability shield limits protection from housing discrimination.
Punting Social Media Company Liability to Congress
The Supreme Court affirms social media companies’ business models, dodging for now the issue of liability for harmful speech.
The Supreme Court and the Future of the Internet
Upcoming Supreme Court decisions may reshape the legal risks facing tech companies.
Tearing Down Terrorist Content Online
Scholar urges policymakers to impose liability on platforms that spread terrorist content.
Pushing Social Media Platforms to Self-Regulate
Social media companies may increase content oversight if motivated by federal incentives and liabilities.
The Social Responsibility of Social Media Platforms
Scholar weighs options for putting an end to harmful speech on social media platforms.
Balancing Liberty and the Public Interest in Loot Box Regulation
Loot boxes pose a regulatory challenge in the United States.
Reconsidering the Internet’s Liability Shield
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act faces criticism from across the political spectrum.