Supreme Court

Legal scholars and practitioners analyze the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

Law professor argues that states play a critical, but often neglected, role in constitutional decision-making.

Rather than raising alarm bells, government uses of artificial intelligence fit well within existing legal frameworks.

Regulatory reform bill’s public hearing requirement will hinder agencies’ attempts to regulate.

Legal scholar argues that the oft-criticized formal rulemaking process has virtues in proper settings.

The Supreme Court declines to resolve issue of whether state hospitals can be sued for false insurance claims.

Regulatory reform bill’s requirement of oral evidentiary hearings for rulemakings may prove to be ineffective.

Oral argument transcripts may reveal Supreme Court Justices’ motivations for speaking.

The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide a case involving the interpretation of a key civil litigation treaty.

Judge Gorsuch’s confirmation hearings offer a key opportunity to examine a judge’s philosophy on the judiciary’s proper role under the Constitution.

A number of Supreme Court doctrines make it difficult for citizens to sue police officers and their government employers.

The legal standard governing police force provides inadequate guidance to police officers and the courts.