U.S. Supreme Court

A recent Supreme Court decision affects ATF’s efforts to redefine gun regulations.

New limits on ATF’s ability to expand statutory scope by redefining key terms may have broader implications.

The time elapsed since the passage of an authorizing statute may influence how the Court views new regulations.

The Court delivers a victory for truck-drivers and other transportation workers.

The Court condemned regulator pressure to cut ties with the gun industry to mitigate financial risk.

The Court stayed the “good neighbor” provision of the Clean Air Act in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency.

The Court unanimously agrees that the Nollan/Dolan test applies to administrative and legislative exactions.

The Court rejected a challenge to FDA approval of mifepristone, but other obstacles could still impede access.

Employees need not show “significant” harm to sustain discrimination claims.

The Supreme Court upholds the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Scholars and practitioners assess the Court’s most significant regulatory decisions of its recently concluded term.

In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court has expanded executive power and elevated the President above the law.